Back to Personal Injury
Malingering / Fraud
A malingering assessment expert evaluation is essential for cases where there is a suspicion of symptom exaggeration or the fabrication of psychological injury. The report utilizes objective clinical testing and forensic analysis to determine the validity of the claimant’s presentation and whether the reported symptoms are consistent with the index incident.
Overview
When this report is required
- To investigate significant inconsistencies between self-reported symptoms and observed clinical behaviour
- To evaluate cases where financial incentives or litigation are suspected of driving symptom presentation
- To address discrepancies between a claimant’s reported limitations and surveillance or social media evidence
- To provide objective evidence in cases where a defendant disputes the authenticity of a psychiatric claim
What the expert assesses
- Symptom Validity Testing (SVT)
- Effort and Performance Validity
- Internal Consistency of Presentation
- External Incentives for Fabrication
- Secondary Gain Motivations
Report specification
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Assessment Setting | In-Person, Clinic, Remote |
| Court Acceptance | County Court, High Court |
| Compliance | CPR Part 35 |
CPR Part 35 Compliant
Digital Delivery
Urgent Instructions
Specialist expertise
Forensic Psychologists
Neuropsychologists
Consultant Psychiatrists
While these are the primary specialists engaged for this instruction type, please note that every case turns on
its own facts. Complex or multi-disciplinary cases may require a bespoke team of experts. Our case managers will
review your specific instruction to ensure the correct clinical match.